The political discourse seems to be cut from the same cloth. The "Teams" are gearing up for their guy to debate the other, and they will both announce that their guy was the winner. Both sides seem immune to fact. The more H.L. Mencken I read the more I agree with his term 'booboisie' - the term he used to describe the uninformed and incurious mass herd of sheeple. What are these debates about? If you listen, they aren't about anything at all. There is tinkering around the edges. Should we tax the masses at 36% or 39%? Should we use the unconstitutional powers of the Patriot Act or the NDAA? Which of the 5 major banks should get more billions of taxpayer funds? How long should the unconstitutional wars continue?
These are all the wrong questions. "If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers". This Thomas Pynchon quote is perfect because the questions in the 'debates' are all wrong, and they serve no interests but those of the State, and those connected to the State. I used to buy into these flawed lines of 'reasoning'. I was a person of the Left for a long time. As I saw the policies of the Establishment Liberals collapsing around me, I reflexively figured the 'other side' was the answer. I wasn't even close. There was a third way. The non aggression credo of the libertarians and the economic freedom of the Austrian School economists is exactly what made sense to me. The timing was perfect, as I was, unknowingly at the time, searching for a philosophy based in logic, non aggression, freedom and common sense.
I use the terms Establishment Liberals and Conservatives because they shill for the established powers. I am currently conversing (on FB) with a woman who professes extreme levels of support for our President. The fact that he has simply repeated the policies of the previous president is meaningless. When I mention the most basic things - the continuation of the wars, the wretched alliance with the Big Banks and the FED with the top echelon of government, the cronyism, the violations of privacy - I was dismissed as a peddler of "BS" and called a 'conservative'. This is indicative of the state of affairs today. Establishment Liberals agree with whatever the Democrats do. We're seeing this now. We have had a repeat of all of the previous administration's policies and wars, but the former protesters are now 'for' the policy. The Establishment Conservatives decry the aggressive advance and onslaught of Big Gov't, but the previous 'conservative' administration expanded gov't at an alarming rate. Then it was OK with these people of course. This is not logical and it defies common sense.
I remember being told that "common sense isn't so common" by one of my graduate school professors. I wasn't sure what he meant at the time. I'm sure now.