Do NOT Trust the SCIENCE (TM)

Perhaps you need to leave the USA to get any sort of journalistic integrity.  

The Daily Mail in the UK requested documents showing the unholy alliance and conspiracy behind the people who are in charge of the SCIENCE! (tm) and their original discussions about the origins of BUG19.

What the Mail got back looks like something out of MAD magazine - practically the whole thing is redacted:

What are they hiding?  Why not show the people what they were talking about and emailing - after all, these are public servants, looking out for the health and welfare of the people.  Aren't they stewards of the Common Good?

I'm a broken down English Teacher, and my work email can be read by administration at any time, and requested by authorities whenever they want.

Why not those at the top of the pyramid?  Why redact practically the whole thing?  Aren't they just "following the SCIENCE?"

From the article:

"The Government has been condemned after refusing to release details of key email conversations involving leading scientists over the origins of Covid-19.

This newspaper used Freedom of Information rules to obtain a cache of 32 emails about a secretive teleconference between British and American health officials held early in the pandemic.

But officials blacked out almost every word before releasing the crucial documents.

Before this discussion, several of the world’s most influential experts believed the new virus most likely came from a laboratory – but days later, the scientists began dismissing such scenarios as ‘implausible’ and branding them conspiracy theories.

The critical call is at the centre of concerns that the scientific establishment tried to stifle debate on the pandemic’s origins, as damning new evidence emerges of US ties to high-risk research on bat viruses in Wuhan, where the first cases emerged in late 2019.

The Mail on Sunday requested emails, minutes and notes on the call between Sir Patrick Vallance – Britain’s chief scientific adviser – and its organisers Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust medical charity, and Anthony Fauci, the US infectious diseases expert and presidential adviser.

Yet when the documents were released they had page after page redacted with thick lines of black ink by Whitehall officials. Even the names of experts copied in on discussions were blocked – and exchanges as trivial as one Edinburgh biologist’s ‘thank you’ for being invited – leaving only a few basic details about the call visible.

The lines left intact include a demand for the discussions, involving 13 participants around the world, to be conducted in ‘total confidence’, and an intriguing email line suggesting ‘we need to talk about the backbone too, not just the insert’."

Vox had this up on the site, and I agree completely.

"Science has no intellectual or moral anchor. It is no more intrinsically reliable than News or Marketing or Propaganda because it is just as much at the mercy of the human factor as the other institutions.

The correct rhetorical response to “I trust the science” is “then you are both stupid and uninformed.”

------------------------------------------------------


Here's how you can help me out during The Collapse:


You can send me Bitcoin Cash (BCH) here:


My Udemy classes are here - extremely low price and you have them forever.

I also sell custom made mugs. I'll do personalized orders as well. They are all made in the United States - in Pennsylvania.

All of the mugs are here on Gearbubble. These are made in the USA, and if you don't want to contribute to Amazon's record profits during this time of CV19, the Gearbubble link is the one to use. Thank you!